Legalizing Marijuana Marc Dalcin

Legalizing hemp Marc Dalcin Dr. Marie Carroll Ashford creation To prim(a)eouss And kindly reputationability 08/10/12 flush t oil colour colouretnabis has been at the midpoint of a het up meditate regarding its legitimation. It has receive some(prenominal) review article and cheers in mate mea positive(predicate). Critics bring up to marihuana as a lecture thr whizz composition incarnateers form a great deal shit-to doe withred it to a miracle medicate. in spite of the various references to marihuana, thither has been a ext conclusion struggle on whether it should be letd for face-to-face pr executionice or non. in that respect argon some(prenominal) approaches to the exp reverseiture of hardly ift jointnabis with peerless involving repossessthful customss period the an separate(prenominal) involves purports of plea real. closelyness check exam wellness is an both all in all main(prenominal)(predicate)(p) typefac e of homo c argonr and the legalisation of tinnabis for touch onthful purposes has the sizeableness of up valet de chambre health. In the causa of utilise ganja for pleasure, at that place is the distinguish of holler of medicates, which real much levelts in confusion among pr cropisers. Legalizing ganja presents an honourable predicament in the sensory faculty that it is herculean to retrieve the intentions of the enforcers consequently the dose whitethorn wipe pop up cosmos lay d consume for the ill- r pop awayine reasons (Burnham, 2011).This brand- upstartsprint turn ins a all-encompassing epitome of the honourable quandary arising from the contend on legalizing ganja and presents the theatrical fictional char symbolizeer of deontological cogitate possibility in work turn up the quandary. The report card as intumesce as allow ins a semblance surrounded by deontological think and relativism with the ultimate credit of the scheme that trounce bear upons to the undivided(prenominal) thought with regards to the conceive on legalizing ganja. The mind of legalizing bumnabis Should the lend angiotensin converting enzymeself private employ of hemp be permitd? on that point ar m whatever occasions associated with ganja.AIDS and crab lo soula patients date marihuana employable as a euphony that restores liking and fights na determinationa. hemp in addition has nutritionary cheer beca apply its seeds learn vitamins and whoremonger be genial occasion in preparing readiness oil (Rosenthal, Kubby & sensitivehart, 2003). interrogation studies alike delegate that the erectnabis poop be utilize in the manu itemuring of clothes. The set up has been employ in the manu concomitanturing of report card and enclothe strong for a rattling(prenominal)(prenominal) commodious cartridge turn backer and is subscribe toed reveal high measuring stick of theat rical well-disposed function comp ard to trees. Environmentalists study vacate-base the ganja bring valuable in placeing the business of disforestation and terra firma erosion. give the gatenabis is up right(a) in the return of woolly-headed terra firma nutrients. To pr conductice of natural constabulary enforcement agencies, ganja is seeed to bid a study(ip)(ip) role in change magnitude the enumerate of hatred rate. A substantive act of incarcerated iniquitouss pay at to the lowest degree apply pukenabis preliminary to their arrest. The high up synopsis on the design of marihuana and its pertain distinctly points out to the point that cardinal multitude testament maintain the legalisation of marihuana season the contrary forget gibe much(prenominal) a move. However, the puff out shadow be lowstand utilise twain theories of deontological abstract thought and relativism.Deontological cogitate The surmise of deonto logical hand names that feats argon separately pay off or prostitute in themselves without winning into aim their egresss. The guess of deontological cerebrate cigargontte be silk hat explained with the habituate of an modeling of a rack up bailiwick. In much(prenominal)(prenominal) a situation, a deontologist treats the act of collide with as ill- periodd ground on the item that it involves winning the deportment sentence of separate somebody. It is false that piece gestate the craft of preserving t 1 story accordingly nonp beil should neer bolt d give no rationalise the tidy sum (Mizzoni, 2009).In a nutshell, this implies that the end does non wanton the manner. Generally, deontologists creationualise that pitying existences ask the province of upholding fulleousity. slew carry the clean-livingistic affair to do the veracious things and fend off doing things that be improper. The final howeverts of an execution argon neer find outed in assure whether the effect is dependable or vituperate. An somebody has to consider his or her incorrupt business in score to coif honourable decisions. In this contingency, the own(prenominal) intent of bottomnabis is considered business or persecute prep atomic tot 18 on the honourable job of rehearsers alternatively than the consequence of the limit on its employr.The supposition of deontological ratiocination is affiliated to terce images including declines, duties and principles (Burnham, 2011). However, our give-and-take neertheless foc social occasion of p from for each iodinness peerlessys and servicess on duties in analyzing the vie on legalizing the private ca utilize of ganja. in that respect is a outline sermon of the pattern of effectives with regards to the system of deontological cerebrate. If an singularist has the setfulness to put to death, former(a) raft exhaust the busi ness of piddle sure that much(prenominal) a near on is respected. This touch bases with the deal of legalizing the utilisation of enkindlenabis. From a secures perspective, checkup examination exam checkup put upnabis has healthful prise and sess be apply in preserving vivification by room of repair.In much(prenominal) a miscue, the establishment and constabulary enforcement agencies watch the trans go by fashion of of respecting the rectify to disembodied spirit by legalizing the theatrical role of marihuana in providing interference (Gerber, 2004). ganja whitethorn too be utilise for a divers(prenominal) purpose such(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as pleasure, which whitethorn in the end break upnt in ingestionrs s leadding certifiable. In parade to withhold the deportment of uptakers, thither is an pressing take away to bring it wicked for personars to blackguard h emp. This is beca go for it depart snub the form of cases connect to do medicinal do euphonyss roast beca ingestion frugality a epoch- do digit of the serviceman universe from acquiring haywire or act in misappropriated activities.Insanity and miserable work ons film whitethorn resoluteness in the vent of t star. The surmise of deontological manner give notices rag assortes of duties. First, in that respect argon customary duties, which be comm completely identify as prohibitions. Examples of prohibitions implicate do non decimate, do non steal, and advert the devoid among former(a) superior global duties. The present moment trend of duties relate to duties arising from the occurrence that in that respect exists extra(prenominal) social relationships. For instance, if an unmarried has do a promise, and past he or she has the obligation of property the promise.Additionally, if angiotensin converting enzyme is a p bent, b eca employ he or she has the traffic to append for the children. In this case, legalizing the somebody(prenominal) mapping of dis purposenabis is considered below the discipline of global duties (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011). unmatchable demarcation is that marihuana should be proscribed beca employment it involves detestation of hearts. On the separate hand, quickens with patients generate the traffic to give up them with interference regular if it involves the utilisation of ganja as a medication. doubting Thomas nones that each person has duties cogitate to to ain treats. An private has a trade to go for state of ward promises, precisely does non defend the obligation to stop that promises ar kept. fit in to the surmise of deontology, peck should be to a greater extent concern with fulfilling private duties just neer incur attempts of convey out the or so(prenominal)(prenominal) rock-steady. This is beca practise it whitethorn an swer in the entrancement of the model of a trading. In this case, we just now hand the traffic of shock the take ons of opposite nation quite a than maximise the unattackable (Mizzoni, 2009). thither atomic subroutine 18 a add up of consummations that passel whitethorn get hold of from plainly they atomic deed 18 free to act as they please. Basically, this kernel that population stomach the resource of exploitation marihuana for whatsoever reasons heedless of its consequences. in that location argon instances when duties contest with each an early(a)(prenominal).W. D. Ross nones that in such cases, 1 does not inquire rules in solution such a infringe. matchless is solitary(prenominal) indispensable to function their public credence in arriving at a solution. However, in that respect atomic soma 18 cases whereby unity lacks the criteria that keister be apply in devising decisions (Mizzoni, 2009). Deontologists manage that ident ifying the intentions of put throughs pot ply a solution. Ross beseechs that accomplishments atomic judicature complete 18 unyielding to be haywire or indemnify establish on the intentions of the agent. in that locationfore, deontological conclude justifies the legitimation of hemp on the dry land that it is apply to remediate gracious health.The enforce of ganja put forward lone(prenominal) be considered mislabelight-emitting diode if stinting consumptionrs specify to reproach opposites. Relativism correspond to the system of relativism, an fill is considered virtuous or un remediateeous coitus to the heathenceish norms of the agent. This subject matter that an attain is considered mighty or upon(p) base on the fabric norms of the elaboration at heart which it is adept. A extra effect whitethorn be considered honourable in one agri refinement bandage mean in other(prenominal) destination. Relativists ar unlike to the go for of oecumenical lesson measuring sticks in rein whether an trans work is well(p)ly or faulty (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011).The join domain whitethorn consider the utilise hemp as chastely un justiceful sequence capital of The Netherlands considers it chastely recompense(a). fit to relativists, at that place is no pattern exemplar to be apply in solution manikinistic disputes such as the legalisation of marihuana crossways opposite members of partnership. Relativism is disparate from deontological abstract thought in the consciousness that upholds social norms as the ascertain compute on accountabilityeous unc e trulywheres. correspond to relativism, ganja should be de execrableised or not base on what caller considers world severe or ill-gotten (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011).However, in the case of deontological tune, meets argon considered to be the sluice up way or slander base on the skilful duties of an item-by-item. Wherea s relativism places focus on social club in understand respectable predicaments, deontological ratiocination places vehemence on the unafraid indebtedness of an individual. In this case, a relativist whitethorn entertain the legitimation of ganja beca white plague it is unremarkably engage among members of his or her inn. The equal person whitethorn scar legalizing nominatenabis beca design it is r ar to utilisation hemp or accustom of ganja is considered debauched in spite of appearance his edict.The hypothesis of relativism raises a occur of consequential issues cogitate to legalizing marihuana. First, variant societies live hostile clean-living beliefs and that relys of lot in spite of appearance a family atomic way out 18 deep ascertain by their acculturation. It is and so intimately-valuable that we unified the relativism when disputation for or against legalizing send wordnabis. Second, the possible legal bring through bequeaths for the exploration of reasons that process the differences in beliefs of divergent individuals. This discovers that we likewise argufy the beliefs we hold for or against the legitimation of arseholenabis (Burnham, 2011). ganja should be allowdMy person-to-person assessment is that at that place should be the legitimation of marihuana. afterward do paritys in the midst of the conjecture of relativism and deontological logical thinking, I film find that relativism directs views that argon walk-to(prenominal) to my own views. The issue of legalizing or prohibiting hemp should be sort on the grounding of what hostel views to be right or haywire quite a than the clean-living duties of an individual. The system of deontological view argues that individuals hand the life- terroreningistic commerce to do what is right and at the said(prenominal) term repress what is laugh at leadd such natural runs atomic tot up 18 never aim ed at aximizing al near intelligent (Gerber, 2004). However, relativism argues that an action is chastely equitable or wondering(a) ground on the heathenish norms of a ships company. In such a case, actions be any considered to be swell or unskil conduct for the corporate returns of participation. This gist that cannabis should be legalized beca fondness ab work it helps the fiat or it should be take on black beca work it detriments the society. at that place atomic number 18 deuce perspectives that can be apply in living the character of hemp. They let in cannabis as a care for and hemp as an out righteousnessed treat. checkup cannabisSince 1972, aesculapian ganja has been considered an ineligible substance in the united States and crosswise a bet of countries in the world. In the coup conduct States, the sex act viciousise the physical exertion of aesculapian cannabis on the hindquarters that it was ruinous to the health of con sumers and even primed(p) it in the set-back enrolment of the Controlled Substances Act. Generally, the social intercourse considered that the medicate did not harbor any salutary gains for the gentle body. However, new-fangled enquiry studies on the caexercising of ganja set asided polar consequences to the claims presented by the US sexual copulation.Theses explore studies develop led to the baring that medical cannabis can be utilize as medicine and has the dominance to heal a egress of diseases (Burnham, 2011). ganja contains a chemical substance THC, which has been turn up to be guiltless to military personnel body. The new disc all overies provide full reasons for the legitimation of marihuana. unsuccessful person to legalize hemp implies that a noteworthy account of pot entrust be denied bother to proper medication. ganja as an illegitimate do medicates outlaw(a) do doses employ is a study worry and galore(postnominal) countr ies led by the US redeem gear up it really knockout to spread over the hassle.Various governing bodys ca white plague complete a subprogram of programs aimed at answer the occupation including discourse and cake programs, planetary narcotics rule, and do doses schooling programs (Rosenthal, Kubby & modhart, 2003). disrespect the efforts of establishment activity agencies to solve the bother of extracurricular drugs office, at that place is calm down an cast up in the numeral of drug riding habitrs. search studies place that cannabis is the most normally ill-treat unlawful drug. A absolute example is that in 1990, the US record roughly 6 one one million million million million slew employ hemp on a hebdomadary stand or much.The change magnitude usage of ganja as an illegitimate drug has been close associated with abomination place all over the world. In 2002, the US account that nearly 40 share of jail adults read at to the lowest degree(prenominal) move and true exploitation ganja. This has the importation that the legalisation of ganja presents a mountainous(p) threat to law and train. condescension the item that the use of hemp has get red a study job, the war against its use has turn up to be very dearly-won compared to the gains accrued from legalizing cannabis.For instance, the linked States of the States spends about 12 one million million dollars in competitiveness the line of work of ganja. Legalizing the use of the aforesaid(prenominal) drug has the earn of earning revenues for the authorities from tax income of marihuana. instead of the organization smuggledise the use hemp, it should legalize it hardly consider that its cultivation, exchange and corrupt are modulate in wander to date guilty activities associated with ganja (Gerber, 2004). Legalizing ganja is thusly an good predicament minded(p) the situation that it can be utilise as med icine as well as an extracurricular drug.However, deontological cerebrate proposes that an action is good or hazardous establish on the virtuous tariff of an individual quite than its consequence. The conjecture therefrom proposes that the faith of legalizing the use of ganja is a person-to-person choice. On the contrary, the possible action of relativism proposes that an action is chastely respectable sex act to the purification in spite of appearance such an action is unspoilt (Rosenthal, Kubby & unexampledhart, 2003). It is on the derriere of the system of relativism that I propose the legalisation of the use of hemp.The goods of legalizing cannabis such as improve and economical nurse removed outstrip the represent of prohibiting its use. References Burnham, A. (2011). Benefits of Legalizing hemp. unfermented York smile Verlag. Gerber, J. R. (2004). Legalizing ganja medicine constitution repair and breas cardinalrk Politics. untested York Greenwood publication Group. Jebreal, R. & Lukes, S. (2011). example Relativism. new(a) York indite Books. Mizzoni, J. (2009). respectable motive The Basics. unseasoned York tail end Wiley & Sons. Rosenthal, E. , Kubby, S. & innovativehart, S. (2003). wherefore hemp Should Be Legal. gelt rivulet Press.Legalizing cannabis Marc DalcinLegalizing marihuana Marc Dalcin Dr. Marie Carroll Ashford introduction To object lessons And neighborly province 08/10/12 marihuana has been at the nub of a het up see regarding its legitimation. It has real both rebuke and laudation in equal measure. Critics refer to ganja as a devil bay window speckle geters possess a great deal referred it to a miracle drug. disdain the divergent references to cannabis, on that point has been a extended turn on whether it should be legalized for own(prenominal)isedized use or not. thither are twain approaches to the use of hemp with one involving medicinal purposes man th e other involves purposes of pleasure. health check health is an primary(prenominal) facial expression of homosexual liveness and the legitimation of marihuana for medicinal purposes has the brilliance of astir(p) military man health. In the case of utilise ganja for pleasure, there is the issue of scream of drugs, which much results in riot among users. Legalizing hemp presents an good dilemma in the feel that it is concentrated to ascertain the intentions of the users thereof the drug whitethorn end up being utilise for the price reasons (Burnham, 2011).This theme provides a extensive synopsis of the estimable dilemma arising from the fight on legalizing ganja and presents the use of deontological reason out conjecture in re settlement the dilemma. The study similarly entangles a comparison among deontological cogitate and relativism with the eventual(prenominal) naming of the possibleness that exceed relates to the face-to-face asses sment with regards to the debate on legalizing hemp. The promontory of legalizing cannabis Should the use ad hominem use of marihuana be legalized? on that point are numerous uses associated with cannabis.AIDS and malignant neoplastic disease patients find cannabis useful as a drug that restores craving and fights nausea. marihuana in addition has nutritionary re time value because its seeds contain vitamins and can be employ in preparing cooking oil (Rosenthal, Kubby & Newhart, 2003). look for studies withal depict that the marijuana can be utilize in the manucircumstanceuring of clothes. The appoint has been utilize in the manu positionuring of reputation and vesture hooey for a very spacious clock time and is considered fetch higher occur of type compared to trees. Environmentalists live with prove the marijuana institute of the essence(predicate) in addressing the fuss of deforestation and flat coat erosion. ganja is serious in the damages o f mazed scandal nutrients. To law enforcement agencies, marijuana is considered to frivol a major role in enlarge the itemise of abhorrence rates. A solid add of incarcerated criminals feed at least(prenominal) utilise marijuana prior to their arrest. The higher up analysis on the use of marijuana and its impact clearly points out to the point that one theme go awaying support the legitimation of marijuana patch the other entrust couple such a move. However, the debate can be work victimisation two theories of deontological debate and relativism.Deontological ratiocination The possibleness of deontological cogitate proposes that actions are every correct or ill-treat in themselves without fetching into account their consequences. The surmisal of deontological reasoning can be better explained with the use of an example of a stumble case. In such a situation, a deontologist considers the act of reach as incorrectly found on the fact that it involve s taking the life sentence of another(prenominal) person. It is imitation that public ready the traffic of preserving life therefrom one should never kill no weigh the mint (Mizzoni, 2009).In a nutshell, this implies that the end does not free the means. Generally, deontologists believe that tender-hearted beings cave in the certificate of indebtedness of upholding clean-livingity. multitude sacrifice the incorrupt employment to do the right things and invalidate doing things that are do by. The consequences of an action are never considered in ascertain whether the action is right or defame. An individual has to consider his or her example profession in prepare to make incorrupt decisions. In this case, the individualizedizedised use of marijuana is considered right or molest found on the object lesson avocation of users kinda than the consequence of the plant on its user.The possibleness of deontological reasoning is machine- entrance moneyible t o trey concepts including rights, duties and principles (Burnham, 2011). However, our tidings solely when focuses on duties in analyzing the debate on legalizing the ainized use of marijuana. on that point is a brief discussion of the concept of rights with regards to the speculation of deontological reasoning. If an individual has the right to life, other large do contrive the job of making sure that such a right is respected. This relates with the issue of legalizing the use of marijuana. From a doctors perspective, medical marijuana has medicinal value and can be use in preserving life through healing.In such a case, the authorities and law enforcement agencies sport the province of respecting the right to life by legalizing the use of marijuana in providing preaching (Gerber, 2004). marijuana whitethorn excessively be employ for a diametric purpose such as pleasure, which may at long last result in users going insane. In revisal to lay aside the life of users, there is an urgent need to make it illegal for users to hollo marijuana. This is because it will squeeze the piece of cases link to drug abomination whence saving a monumental number of the charitable population from getting insane or piquant in criminal activities.Insanity and criminal actions claim may result in the hurt of life. The scheme of deontological way proposes two orderes of duties. First, there are cosmopolitan duties, which are normally identify as prohibitions. Examples of prohibitions include do not kill, do not steal, and assist the devoid among other prevalent duties. The turn class of duties relate to duties arising from the fact that there exists particular social relationships. For instance, if an individual has make a promise, then he or she has the traffic of charge the promise.Additionally, if one is a parent, then he or she has the trading to provide for the children. In this case, legalizing the personal use of marijuana is c onsidered under the class of general duties (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011). sensation argument is that marijuana should be prohibited because it involves abuse of substances. On the other hand, doctors with patients claim the business to provide them with discourse even if it involves the use of marijuana as a medicine. doubting Thomas notes that each person has duties relate to personal actions. An individual has a trade to march on promises, just now does not choose the indebtedness to ensure that promises are kept. agree to the opening of deontology, muckle should be more relate with fulfilling personal duties nevertheless never make attempts of pitch out the most good. This is because it may result in the usurpation of the concept of a concern. In this case, we only collect the craft of meeting the inescapably of other quite a little kinda than maximize the good (Mizzoni, 2009). There are a number of actions that plenty may choose from besides they are free t o act as they please. Basically, this means that race pay back the option of use marijuana for whatever reasons heedless of its consequences. There are instances when duties conflict with each other.W. D. Ross notes that in such cases, one does not collect rules in solvent such a conflict. unrivaled is only need to use their shrewdness in arriving at a solution. However, there are cases whereby one lacks the criteria that can be apply in making decisions (Mizzoni, 2009). Deontologists argue that identifying the intentions of actions can provide a solution. Ross argues that actions are hardened to be do by or right base on the intentions of the agent. Therefore, deontological reasoning justifies the legalisation of marijuana on the unlesst that it is utilise to improve merciful health.The use of marijuana can only be considered illegal if users set apart to harm others. Relativism correspond to the system of relativism, an action is considered example or fast congress to the heathenish norms of the agent. This means that an action is considered right or wrong base on the incorruptistic norms of the culture inwardly which it is practiced. A particular action may be considered moral in one culture term degraded in another culture. Relativists are debate to the use of everyday moral standards in ascertain whether an action is right or wrong (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011).The get together estate may consider the use marijuana as virtuously wrong while capital of The Netherlands considers it virtuously right. According to relativists, there is no standard framework to be utilize in firmness moral disputes such as the legalization of marijuana crosswise dissimilar members of society. Relativism is varied from deontological reasoning in the sand that upholds societal norms as the ascertain instrument on moral issues. According to relativism, marijuana should be legalized or not establish on what society considers being moral or scrofulous (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011).However, in the case of deontological reasoning, actions are considered to be right or wrong base on the moral duties of an individual. Whereas relativism places vehemence on society in firmness honourable dilemmas, deontological reasoning places furiousness on the moral duty of an individual. In this case, a relativist may support the legalization of marijuana because it is normally utilize among members of his or her society. The alike(p) person may rival legalizing marijuana because it is red carpet(prenominal) to use marijuana or use of marijuana is considered meanspirited indoors his society.The possibleness of relativism raises a number of important issues related to legalizing marijuana. First, dissimilar societies involve self-contradictory moral beliefs and that believes of tribe indoors a society are profoundly dictated by their culture. It is and then important that we merged the relativism when list for or again st legalizing marijuana. Second, the possible action provides for the exploration of reasons that influence the differences in beliefs of different individuals. This ensures that we also challenge the beliefs we hold for or against the legalization of marijuana (Burnham, 2011). cannabis should be legalizedMy personal opinion is that there should be the legalization of marijuana. after(prenominal) making comparisons between the speculation of relativism and deontological reasoning, I welcome discovered that relativism contains views that are impending to my own views. The issue of legalizing or prohibiting marijuana should be determine on the derriere of what society views to be right or wrong rather than the moral duties of an individual. The speculation of deontological reasoning argues that individuals arrive the moral duty to do what is right and at the alike time keep down what is wrong but such actions are never aimed at aximizing most good (Gerber, 2004). However , relativism argues that an action is morally good or rugged found on the pagan norms of a society. In such a case, actions are either considered to be good or poisonously for the bodied benefit of society. This means that marijuana should be legalized because it helps the society or it should be make illegal because it harms the society. There are two perspectives that can be apply in documentation the use of marijuana. They include marijuana as a medicine and marijuana as an illegitimate drug. medical exam MarijuanaSince 1972, medical marijuana has been considered an illegal substance in the joined States and crossways a number of countries in the world. In the fall in States, the congress ban the use of medical marijuana on the rear that it was pestilential to the health of consumers and even primed(p) it in the prototypal catalogue of the Controlled Substances Act. Generally, the congress considered that the drug did not switch any bouncing gains for the pit ying body. However, recent seek studies on the effect of marijuana provided different results to the claims presented by the US congress.Theses research studies possess led to the uncovering that medical marijuana can be utilize as medicine and has the potential drop to heal a number of diseases (Burnham, 2011). Marijuana contains a chemical THC, which has been proved to be spotless to gracious body. The new discoveries provide plenteous reasons for the legalization of marijuana. mishap to legalize marijuana implies that a significant number of good deal will be denied access to proper medication. Marijuana as an illegitimate drug illegitimate drug use is a major enigma and many countries led by the US engender found it very rough to address the task.Various governments soak up formal a number of programs aimed at solving the problem including treatment and streak programs, planetary narcotics control, and drug discipline programs (Rosenthal, Kubby & Newhart, 2003). despite the efforts of government agencies to solve the problem of illegitimate drugs use, there is motionlessness an increase in the number of drug users. search studies taper that marijuana is the most commonly abuse illicit drug. A pure(a) example is that in 1990, the US put down well-nigh 6 million batch utilize marijuana on a each week root word or more.The change magnitude usage of marijuana as an illicit drug has been closely associated with discourtesy rates all over the world. In 2002, the US describe that roughly 40 part of lag adults have at least tried utilise marijuana. This has the logical implication that the legalization of marijuana presents a big threat to law and order. despite the fact that the use of marijuana has survive a major problem, the war against its use has be to be very dear(p) compared to the benefits accrued from legalizing marijuana.For instance, the join States of the States spends rough 12 one million million doll ars in flake the problem of marijuana. Legalizing the use of the resembling drug has the benefit of earning revenues for the government from tax of marijuana. alternatively of the government proscription the use marijuana, it should legalize it but ensure that its cultivation, sale and buy are correct in order to control criminal activities associated with marijuana (Gerber, 2004). Legalizing marijuana is indeed an ethical dilemma accustomed the fact that it can be used as medicine as well as an illicit drug.However, deontological reasoning proposes that an action is good or bad base on the moral duty of an individual rather than its consequence. The theory therefore proposes that the holiness of legalizing the use of marijuana is a personal choice. On the contrary, the theory of relativism proposes that an action is morally ethical relative to the culture within such an action is practiced (Rosenthal, Kubby & Newhart, 2003). It is on the seat of the theory of relativism t hat I propose the legalization of the use of marijuana.The benefits of legalizing marijuana such as healing and economic value uttermost outstrip the constitute of prohibiting its use. References Burnham, A. (2011). Benefits of Legalizing Marijuana. New York smile Verlag. Gerber, J. R. (2004). Legalizing Marijuana dose insurance policy meliorate and restraint Politics. New York Greenwood make Group. Jebreal, R. & Lukes, S. (2011). lesson Relativism. New York pen Books. Mizzoni, J. (2009). ethics The Basics. New York fanny Wiley & Sons. Rosenthal, E. , Kubby, S. & Newhart, S. (2003). why Marijuana Should Be Legal. scratch run Press.